Test 2

Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

Login

Remember Me

New to Fridae?

Fridae Mobile

Highlights
Advertisement

More About Us

9 Apr 2010

Philippine Supreme Court allows gay party to contest May 10 polls

The LGBT community in Philippines won a political victory this week as the country's highest court recognised Ang Ladlad, a LBGT group as a legitimate political party for the first time and can participate as a party-list group in next month's elections.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Thursday recognised gay group Ang Ladlad as a legitimate political party for the first time and approved the petition of Ang Ladlad group to represent lesbians, gays, homosexuals, and bisexuals (LGBT) as a party-list group in the May 10 elections, according to local media reports. (What is the party-list system?)

The court overturned the decision of the Commission on Elections (Comelec) disqualifying Ang Ladlad's application as a party-list group. Comelec is one of the three constitutional commissions of the Philippines whose principal role is to enforce all laws and regulations relative to the conduct of elections, initiatives, referendums, and recalls.

The body caused outrage among gays and liberals last November by saying the group cannot run as a political party because it "tolerates immorality which offends religious beliefs." Three of the commissioners cited passages from the Bible and the Quran to justify their ruling, claiming that Ang Ladlad (Out of the Closet) exposes young people to "an environment that does not conform to the teachings of our faith."

Ang Ladlad, which was established in 2003, filed a case in January with the Supreme Court.

The court said the poll body erred in its decision to deny Ang Ladlad's accreditation as a party-list group based on moral grounds and failed to explain "what societal ills are sought to be prevented, or why special protection is required for the youth" to justify the denial of accreditation of Ang Ladlad.

The decision penned by Associate Justice Mariano del Castillo reads in part:

"We are not blind to the fact that, through the years, homosexual conduct, and perhaps homosexuals themselves, have borne the brunt of societal disapproval.  It is not difficult to imagine the reasons behind this censure – religious beliefs, convictions about the preservation of marriage, family, and procreation, even dislike or distrust of homosexuals themselves and their perceived lifestyle. Nonetheless, we recall that the Philippines has not seen fit to criminalize homosexual conduct.

"We hold that moral disapproval, without more, is not a sufficient governmental interest to justify exclusion of homosexuals from participation in the party-list system.The denial of Ang Ladlad’s registration on purely moral grounds amounts more to a statement of dislike and disapproval of homosexuals, rather than a tool to further any substantial public interest.

"Respondent’s blanket justifications give rise to the inevitable conclusion that the Comelec targets homosexuals themselves as a class, not because of any particular morally reprehensible act. It is this selective targeting that implicates our equal protection clause.

"The Comelec posits that the majority of the Philippine population considers homosexual conduct as immoral and unacceptable, and this constitutes sufficient reason to disqualify the petitioner. Unfortunately for the respondent, the Philippine electorate has expressed no such belief.  No law exists to criminalize homosexual behavior or expressions or parties about homosexual behavior.  Indeed, even if we were to assume that public opinion is as the Comelec describes it, the asserted state interest here – that is, moral disapproval of an unpopular minority – is not a legitimate state interest that is sufficient to satisfy rational basis review under the equal protection clause. The Comelec’s differentiation, and its unsubstantiated claim that Ang Ladlad cannot contribute to the formulation of legislation that would benefit the nation, furthers no legitimate state interest other than disapproval of or dislike for a disfavored group."

The Supreme Court in conclusion said its role in deciding the case "is not to impose its own view of acceptable behavior. Rather, it is to apply the Constitution and laws as best as it can, uninfluenced by public opinion, and confident in the knowledge that our democracy is resilient enough to withstand vigorous debate."


What is the Party-List System?

The party-list system of election was intended by the Constitution to ensure that the voice of the marginalized sectors in society is heard in Congress. In theory, this is ensured by allotting 20 percent of the total number of Congressmen ( the members of both the Senate and the House of Representatives) to representatives coming from marginalized sectoral, regional and national parties, coalitions or organizations. Representatives elected via the party-list system are different from the members of the Lower House. The latter represent their constituents in their respective districts—their representation is thus based on geography. Party-list representatives represent the constituents of the marginalized sectors of society. These marginalized sectors are those belonging to the labor, peasant, urban poor, indigenous cultural communities, women, youth, and such other sectors identified by law (Republic Act No. 7941, in this case), with the exception of religious groups. 

From: Understanding the party-list system

 

Philippines » Metro Manila

Reader's Comments

1. 2010-04-09 17:22  
Good judgement and comments by the Court; nice to see reason beat bigotry.

The following passage could equally apply to Singapore's irrational ban on gay groups:-
"The denial of Ang Ladlad’s registration on purely moral grounds amounts more to a statement of dislike and disapproval of homosexuals, rather than a tool to further any substantial public interest."

Just substitute any gay group in Singapore for Ang Ladlad.
2. 2010-04-09 20:09  
It was a nice move towards gay recognition in the Philippines.. Let's just hope The party list just didn't use the gay community for personal and political gains. There are more unspoken and unheard gay discrimination and prejudice on LGBT, that is where they should focus on.. Gays and GBTs are not the pestilence in the society..
Comment #3 was deleted by its author on 2010-04-09 20:10
4. 2010-04-09 21:17  
I want to be in Philippines now and run for the election!! WOW!!
5. 2010-04-09 23:03  
Finally!
6. 2010-04-10 02:07  
What a sensible and unbiased court! Does that mean Philippines now has a chance of getting a gay president?
7. 2010-04-10 03:52  
Is this a world first, a queer political party?
8. 2010-04-10 04:52  
there are no Violations according to the law that can make Ang Ladlad a disqualifying party-list in the first place... thank God, the Gov't is using their heads now... :| now I'm kinda loving the Philippine Gov't for that... :) Mabuhay ang mga Pinoy!
9. 2010-04-10 10:32  
its nice to hear this news great for pinoy gays like me...
10. 2010-04-10 18:57  
Just loving this news. Gives a really clear reason why the principles of separation fo state, judiciary and administration needs to be vigorously defended in ny democrary to ensure that all are held into account rather than collude with one another to bully minorities of all sorts. well done Phillippines!
11. 2010-04-10 21:38  
Let's all vote for ladlad!
12. 2010-04-12 09:49  
Cheers. Congratulations. Hope your Supreme Court will legalize gay marriage someday.

From Kazuki (Canada)
13. 2010-04-12 14:53  
seems like the only way to get anything passed these days is through the legal system and courts, sounds like a smart way to go
14. 2010-04-16 15:42  
Such great news - Well done Pinoys - leading the way for LGBT representation and rights!!

Please log in to use this feature.

Social


Select News Edition

Featured Profiles

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

Like Us on Facebook

Partners

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement