Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

Login

Remember Me

New to Fridae?

Fridae Mobile App

Highlights
Agenda
Fridae Shop
Directory
Advertisement
10 May 2012

Hong Kong: Gay groups clash over controversial politician invited to rally

For My Colours, a coalition which organised the IDAHO rallies from 2005-2008, has clashed with the Pink Alliance – organisers of this year's rally on May 12 – over an invited politican known for her anti-mainland immigration and anti-democratic views in an all-out spat.

Advertisement

For My Colours, a coalition comprising five LGBT groups, published a public statement opposing IDAHOT Hong Kong’s association with Legislative Councilor Regina Ip just four days before the rally scheduled to be held this Saturday. The rally is held to commemorate the 8th International Day Against Homophobia & Transphobia, commonly known as IDAHO internationally.

Legislative Councilor Regina Ip

“We are very disappointed with regards to Pink Alliance’s recent invitation to former Secretary for Security, Mrs. Regina Ip, as the spokesperson of IDAHOT 2012,” read the statement published on May 8 and co-signed by NuTongXueShe, Midnight Blue, Comrade Zone, Women Coalition of HKSAR and Rainbow Action.

In an email to Fridae, a spokesperson for Pink Alliance, the organiser of the IDAHOT rally clarified that Ip is not the spokesperson for the rally but was invited, amongst other politicians, to attend the event. Her party is the second in Hong Kong after the Labour party to publish a statement supporting LGBT rights on their electoral platform. As she is unable to attend, she recorded a video message which appears on the rally’s website.


Click here for the Cantonese version.

Speakers at the IDAHOT rally will include pro-democratic legislators Cyd Ho, Lee Cheuk Yan and Audrey Eu while pop star Anthony Wong, who publicly came out as gay last month, is slated to attend the rally.

For My Colours is opposed to the rally’s association with Ip who is known for her discriminatory stance concerning mainland Chinese immigrants and in the past pushed legislation to expand the government’s powers despite broad opposition from the public.

The first IDAHO rally in Hong Kong was organised by For My Colours and several other groups in 2005 and annually until 2008; the running of the annual IDAHO rally has since been taken on by the Tongzhi Community Joint Meeting (TCJM), and now the Pink Alliance.

Connie Chan, the chairperson of Women Coalition, told Fridae: “Whether or not Mrs Ip is a spokesperson, I think the LGBT movement should work towards an equal and just society, Mrs Ip incites discriminations against new arrivals from Mainland and ethnic minorities, tries to enforce Basic Law article 23 to suppress freedom of speech, obviously Mrs Ip is not the one who stand for equality, justice, and human rights.”

In 2003, as the then Secretary for Security, she spearheaded the government's attempt to codify Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 or “anti-subversion” legislation which resulted in her resignation following a 500,000 strong street protest.

The statement continued: “LGBTQI movement is part of civil society, stands together with other minorities from different walks of life. In order to establish a solid and stable social movement, we must embrace others who are at the same position, eg. new arrivals from Mainland, ethnic minorities, sex workers, women, physically/mentally disabled, diverse families, grass-root workers, freedom of speech, democracy & universal suffrage, Chinese human rights activists etc. 

“Therefore, we simply cannot accept someone who incites discriminations against new arrivals from Mainland and ethnic minorities… Mrs Regina Ip to attend and support LGBTQI equality right promotional events. Because we are not those who only care for our own benefits and neglect others. 

“So would it mean if Hitler was gay, we can still support and depend on him to fight for LGBTQI rights as well?” The statement asked rhetorically. 

The remark references Ip’s comments at a City University of Hong Kong forum in 2002 where she said: “Hitler was elected by the people. But he ended up killing seven million people. This proves that democracy is not a cure-all medicine."

As the organiser of the rally, Pink Alliance (TCJM) Chairman Reggie Ho says the group is appreciative of the support of any politician or party which supports LGBT rights.

He also rejects the view that Ip is supporting the event to attract LGBT votes given that she has announced that she will lead her party in September's Legislative Council election.

“They (For My Colours) should know better than that - how many Hong Kong politicians out there ever got voted in because of endorsing the LGBT cause? If anything, the fear of otherwise has always prevailed in the political circle. What Regina has done, I think, is courageous.” 

Ho added: “With tongzhi groups expressing different views, it reflects an open and diverse society… At the event, there will be pro-democratic legislators in attendance, which shows that our supporters can come from different political backgrounds, and they all seek common ground while reserving differences.”

The For My Colours alliance has announced a street forum that will take place on May 17 to commemorate IDAHO. The forum titled “Who Stole our LGBT Movement" and will feature “discussions on the latest strategies for the LGBT movement in Hong Kong, an analysis of homophobia around world and a review of the collaborations between LGBT organisations and civil society”.

“Who Stole our LGBT Movement" Street Forum
Date: May 17, 2012 (Thu)
Time: 7-9.30pm
Venue: Clock Tower, Time Square, Causeway Bay

The IDAHOT Hong Kong rally is themed “What To Fear?!”and aims to eliminate homophobic and transphobic bullying in Hong Kong, and to commemorate victims of homophobic and transphobic bullying in past years.

IDAHOT Hong Kong Rally: “What To Fear?!”
Date: May 12, 2012 (Sat)
Time: 3-5pm
Venue: Chater Gardens, Central
Dress code: Black

Hong Kong

Reader's Comments

1. 2012-05-11 18:00
Anyone who brings up Hitler in an argument loses immediately.
2. 2012-05-11 18:08
Comparing people to Hitler? C'mon, it's hyperbole like this that stops any decent debate dead in its tracks, and the only alternative is for the two sides to just glare at each other when they've stopped screaming.
3. 2012-05-13 02:09
150 paticipants, 50% westerners.....much ado about (almost) nothing....
4. 2012-05-13 21:56
Nobody will fit anyone's bill 100%. Can't we all just....get along?
Comment #5 was deleted by its author on 2012-05-14 00:01
Comment #6 was deleted by its author on 2012-05-14 00:09
Comment #7 was deleted by its author on 2012-05-14 00:21
8. 2012-05-14 00:19
This is yet another example when they said that sometimes, some of the worst enemies of Gays are Gays themselves - some of them seem to have the tendency of ripping off and dismantling years of efforts to achieve what they have done for Gay Rights and Gay Acceptance . They do this by a lot of BITCHING and quarelling amongst themselves, tearing each other apart over relatively minor issues. Why are some of these gay (and lesbian) people like that ? Why can't they be more patient and focus on the "BIGGER PICTURE", ie, the long term acceptance of others for gays and lesbians by others, and for them to be treated in society as equals? We, gays and lesbians, are far from achieving that especially in places like Hong Kong, and yet, these so-called Gay Representatives in our society are tearing each other apart already instead of trying to work out their differences. These gay groups organizers ought to be ashamed of themselves . If they cannot UNITE the Gay and Lesbian society, which is what they should be trying to do, and if all they can do is QUARREL and BITCH and divide the gay and lesbian community, in my humble opinion, they should resign and let other more mature-behaving people (gays and lesbians, of course) take over!
9. 2012-05-14 16:55
She did attend the event, I wuz there! :)
10. 2012-05-16 02:00
I agree Asian Dream 2.
11. 2012-05-16 12:21
Comment no. 8: "If they cannot UNITE the Gay and Lesbian society, which is what they should be trying to do, and if all they can do is QUARREL and BITCH and divide the gay and lesbian community, in my humble opinion, they should resign and let other more mature-behaving people (gays and lesbians, of course) take over!"

What I see happening is a plurality of views being expressed which is ultimately a good thing. Is there a point to appear united when in fact the groups do not agree on the spokesperson?

I can see the same question being posed to any LGBT community in any country. Should LGBTs accept the support of any politician or public figure who is "supportive" of LGBTs but have objectionable views on other matters of importance? I think we should agree to disagree if that's the case and not be silent just to appear united as a community.
12. 2012-05-28 23:47
Gay groups will be more successful if they are more united, there is a reason why there is a saying, divide and rule. But they need to focus unity on matters of gay equality, since they will have a plurality of views on other issues. That's normal.

Please log in to use this feature.

Select News Edition

Recent Articles

Song kran 2014: Whos Going?

Featured Profiles

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

Like Us on Facebook

Partners

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement