Test 2

Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

登入

記住我

初到 Fridae?

Fridae Mobile

Advertisement
Highlights

More About Us

新聞&特寫

« 較新的 | 較舊的 »
17 Aug 2012

Most young Thai MSM define as heterosexual, even if they mainly have sex with men

A large, randomised sample of 21-year-old Thai men has found that by far the largest risk factor for HIV infection is gay identity. Scientists found that compared with exclusive 'tops', 'versatile' gay men were 6.8 times more likely to have HIV and exclusive 'bottoms' 8.6 times more likely.

A large, randomised sample of 21-year-old Thai men, presented at the 19th International AIDS Conference in Washington recently, has found that by far the largest risk factor for HIV infection is gay identity. Contrary to the oft-quoted saying “it’s not who you are, but what you do,” actual male/male sexual behaviour, while still an important risk factor, was not as strongly associated with being HIV positive as gay identity.

Adamslove.org, a social media campaign organised by the Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre to increase the awareness of HIV/AIDS among the MSM community in Thailand and encourage Safe Sex and HIV Testing.

The survey was conducted among over 35,000 army conscripts from all parts of Thailand. All 21-year old Thai men enter a lottery at the age of 21 for conscription into the Thai army and of these half a million young men, 60,00 to 100,000, in any year, are conscripted, twice a year in May and October.

This survey thus constituted a truly randomised, cross-sectional survey of the 21-year-old men who were inducted into the Thai army in May 2011. It was conducted no more than two weeks after induction and therefore serving in the army had no influence on the results. Men from all provinces in Thailand were included and from both urban and rural areas.

The survey found that 7% of respondents had had sex with another man (MSM) but that only 1.1% only had sex with men.

In all MSM, 83% identified as heterosexual, i.e. desiring women only. Even in exclusive MSM, only 21% said they desired men exclusively and 31% both men and women, meaning that nearly half (48%) of men who’d in fact only ever had male partners said they actually preferred women.

Only 0.5% of all respondents had HIV, and only 2.6% of the MSM. However HIV prevalence increased to 9.4% in men who exclusively had sex with men, and to 16% in men who said they preferred sex with men, i.e. who identified as gay or transgender. Gay identity was in fact quite uncommon, at 180 individuals out of 35,359, or 0.5% of respondents.

Having sex with both men and women was associated with a 4.5-fold higher risk of having HIV, and solely having sex with men with a 35-fold raised risk; but defining oneself as wanting sex with men and women was associated with a 26-fold raised risk, and as wanting sex only with men with an over 60-fold raised risk.

One of the explanations for desire being a greater risk factor than behaviour was that sex role was highly predictive of HIV infection: compared with exclusive ‘tops’, versatile gay men were 6.8 times more likely to have HIV and exclusive ‘bottoms’ 8.6 times more likely. If non-gay-identified MSM are more likely to be insertive, this would explain why activity was less predictive of HIV than identity.

Another might be that the culturally-accepted way of being an MSM in Thailand, at least outside urban centres with gay scenes, has tended to be to become a Katoey (ladyboy/transgender). 'Out' Kaoteys would tend to be exempted from military service, until 2011 because they had a 'mental disorder', now changed to 'gender identity disorder'. So this survey would tend to under-represent certain self-identified MSM.

Other traditional HIV risk factors were more common than MSM sex. While only 3.2% of all respondents had ever injected drugs, 33% had had sex with a female sex worker, 10% had been in prison and no less than 52% had ever used non-injectable methamphetamine which, as Yaa Baa (‘mad pills’), is the most common recreational drug in the country.

Other risk factors associated with HIV included having a lot or a little education, compared with the average: being a graduate was associated with a nearly two-fold raised risk of HIV and having less than 10 years’ education with a 1.7-fold raised risk. Other unsurprising risk factors were having been paid for sex (5.6% of respondents had, and 2% of those had HIV), ever having had forced sex, and having had more than six lifetime sex partners (the median number), which doubled the HIV risk.

Other risk factors were all heightened in men who’d had sex with men (except injection drug use, which was no more common). Of all MSM, 19% had been jailed, 16% had ever had forced sex, 31% had sold sex for money, and no less than 69% had used methamphetamines. Perhaps surprisingly, even the proportion who had had sex with female sex workers was higher than in the whole sample – 52%.


Slides are obtained from the webcast viewable at aids2012.org

However, far from their being risk factors for HIV infection, in the whole group, having had sex with a female sex worker and injection drug use were actually associated with a reduced risk of HIV infection. These associations were not statistically significant, but in the group of men who had sex with men, sex with female sex workers and imprisonment were also associated with a lower likelihood of HIV infection, and these associations were significant.

The researchers found that condom use with female sex workers (FSWs) was very high – 93% of the men used one last time they had contact with an FSW and 71% every time in the last 12 months. The same was true of female casual partners – 79% had used a condom with one last time, though only 29% all the time in the last year. But when it came to sex with men, condom use was less common, with 65% using one last time and 21% consistently in the last year.

The findings of this survey differ from previous surveys of gay men in selected Thai cities, which have found very high rates of HIV prevalence (30% in Bangkok) and incidence (over 6%).

This shows the difference between surveying a self-selecting gay/MSM population – the Bangkok surveys have been conducted in gay clubs, STI clinics and cruising areas – and looking at sexuality and HIV prevalence in a truly random sample of men.

The most interesting findings were that MSM behaviour and gay sexuality or desire were so loosely associated with each other, and that the risk factors traditionally associated with HIV in Thailand appear no longer to be risk factors.

Reference

Rangsin R et al. The recent impact of MSM on the prevalence of HIV-1 among young men in Thailand. Nineteenth International AIDS Conference, Washington DC. Abstract THAC0303. 2012. See abstract here.

This article was first published by NAM/Aidsmap.com and is republished with permission.



The recent impact of MSM on the prevalence of HIV-1 infection
among young men in Thailand (Time: 17 mins)
Speaker: Professor Ram Rangsin, author of the study and
an epidemiologist attached to the Royal Thai Army

Thailand

讀者回應

1. 2012-08-17 21:07  
Chilling..
2. 2012-08-17 23:38  
But Bangkok still considered gay paradise
3. 2012-08-18 03:20  
Interesting results, but it fails to represent a true cross-section because not all 21-year olds are required to enter the lottery. Two-years participation in a high-school ROTC program provides automatic exemption. While I am not certain of the numbers that gain exemption from the lottery in this manner, I am sure that significant percentage of the gay Thai men I know, both from Bangkok and transplants from the provinces, chose to take the ROTC program to avoid potential conscription. It seems to me, the study results are not particularly clear or conclusive without a study of the exempted males to both compare to and to role into the overal study results.

Another point is that I am curious as to the how the "self-identified" gay men's risk behaviors are affected by both forced sexual history and isolation. I am curious as there doesn't seem to be much emphasis on how this information can be used to address prevention shortfalls...

回應#4於於2012-08-18 08:43被作者刪除。
回應#5於於2012-08-18 08:45被作者刪除。
6. 2012-08-18 04:53  
@4 reports like these are only "snapshot" of a very complex picture at a particular time. They do not apply to everybody. They can be seen as an "average" and you do not have to conform to the results (though one day you might).

HIV in Thai women varies depending on "occupation" and risk exposure. At the population level it is about 0.9%-1.3% but much higher amongst sex workers (up to 19% depending on reports).

Not sure what you mean by "on tattoo candidates". Tattooing is not a major cause of infection (or a minor one).

This survey would also have excluded a number of Katoye who are excluded from military service but are also more affected by HIV.

Amongst MSM in Bangkok gay venues (bar, sauna, park) the estimate was 24.7% in 2009 down from 28% in 2005. So that is still 1 in 4 in some area.
修改於2012-08-18 05:03:34
回應#7於於2012-08-18 09:14被作者刪除。
8. 2012-08-18 09:15  
Actually, it happens everywhere all around the world.
9. 2012-08-18 12:05  
Seems to me this survey may have some problem.

1) why so few self identifying homosexuals? They percentage shown is much lower than that found anywhere else. Maybe like slingtown said most gays are taking ROTC to opt out or for some reason people didn't trust the survey to stay confidential or some other factor is going on.

2) the conclusion that identifying yourself as gay raises the danger, seems a bit bogus. look again the factor that raises the percentage rate is the lack of condom use. You have a group with a percentage difference of 50%. the findings don't take anything from this. It seems there is a major bias in the researchers looking for a way of stating their finidings to make it look more sensational. because people who don't use condoms are much more likely to contract HIV just doesn't look exciting.
10. 2012-08-18 18:57  
UNLIKE!
11. 2012-08-19 02:27  
Stupid
12. 2012-08-19 10:18  
I dun care. As long as I protect myself well, nothing to worry.
13. 2012-08-19 10:19  
I dun care. As long as I protect myself well, nothing to worry.
14. 2012-08-20 07:51  
Identity is not the problem, behavior is. MSM tops can get and transmit HIV. Condom use with water based lube for penatrative sex prevents HIV transmission along with many other STDs.
15. 2012-08-20 11:48  
I think behavior is the problem...plus the fact that Economy in Thailand is not that booming,apparently, extra caution maybe imposed....really really safe sex...
16. 2012-08-21 02:40  
results surprising? not really....
17. 2012-08-23 07:48  
blah almost half of guys I hooked up with in Bangkok were not too keen on me putting on condom or even asked me not to use one. I am not talking about the hookers- these were not poor the guys I meet were office workers, bank workers and such. They were not high not stupid and totally aware of the risks. They just did not give shit about rubber. so that is what I call chilling. analyse this.
18. 2012-08-24 09:24  
As another poster said, this survey isn't as random as represented. There are many ways to avoid conscription, with the result that actual inductees represent mostly the poor and uneducated. A lack of 'gay identity' among this class of Thai society is not surprising.
19. 2012-08-28 12:50  
Overall I find it to be an interesting study. However I have to disagree with the conclusions related to the findings:

"The findings of this survey differ from previous surveys of gay men in selected Thai cities, which have found very high rates of HIV prevalence (30% in Bangkok) and incidence (over 6%).

This shows the difference between surveying a self-selecting gay/MSM population – the Bangkok surveys have been conducted in gay clubs, STI clinics and cruising areas – and looking at sexuality and HIV prevalence in a truly random sample of men."

This study was only among 21 year olds. I am assuming most other studies at MSM venues that found HIV prevalence of 30% also had men of all ages and therefore are not comparable. For example, the US CDC found HIV prevalence among MSM in 21 cities to be 19%. However prevalence was found higher the older the cohort since they have had more chances to become infected. Additionally this study states it differs from other studies and highlights that other studies have found incidence of 6%. This study didnt measure incidence. While the conclusions might be correct, aka, that this type of study will produce different results, it didnt do so. Maybe the author looked at the other studies more carefully and pulled out HIV prev. by age, but am not sure.
回應#20已於於2012-11-12 12:46被管理員刪除。

請先登入再使用此功能。

請選擇新聞及專欄版本

精選個人檔案

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

讚好

合作夥伴

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement