Test 2

Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

登入

記住我

初到 Fridae?

Fridae Mobile

Advertisement
Highlights

More About Us

新聞&特寫

« 較新的 | 較舊的 »
27 Feb 2013

Over 60 US companies to support same-sex marriage in US Supreme Court

At least 60 American corporations including Apple Inc, Nike Inc, Facebook Inc, Morgan Stanley, Intel Corp, Xerox Corp, AIG Inc and Cisco Systems Inc have indicated that they will sign on to two legal briefs to signal their support for same-sex marriage.

According to Reuters, the briefs are due to be filed this week with the US Supreme Court. One is expected on Wednesday in a case that challenges the federal Defense of Marriage Act in which Section 3 defines marriage as between one man and one woman, and one due on Thursday in a case that challenges California’s Proposition 8 which bans same-sex marriage. The two cases are to be argued on March 26 and 27.

The report quotes attorney Joshua Rosenkranz as having written in the Proposition 8 brief that companies believe that the ban and other laws like it "inflict real and wholly unnecessary injury on business."

"By marginalising same-sex couples and foreclosing gay men and lesbians from forming 'married' families, these bans on equal access to marriage stigmatise gay men and lesbians and deprive them of the benefits intrinsic to marriage," he added.

Even if a corporation welcomes gay and lesbian unions, "it cannot overcome the societal stigma institutionalised by Proposition 8 and similar laws." He also made the argument that there is "a strong business case" for recognising same-sex marriage. Gay marriage bans "can impede business efforts to recruit, hire and retain the best workers," he added.

Read: Some companies to back gay marriage in coming Supreme Court cases (Reuters)

Fortune has more details:

On Thursday, dozens of American corporations, including Apple, Alcoa, Facebook, eBay, Intel, and Morgan Stanley will submit an amicus [friend-of-the-court] brief in the landmark Hollingsworth v. Perry case broadly arguing to the U.S. Supreme Court that laws banning same-sex marriages, like California's ballot initiative Proposition 8, are unconstitutional under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses.

According to a draft copy obtained by Fortune, the companies argue that such laws "send an unmistakeable signal that same-sex couples are in some way inferior to opposite-sex couples, a proposition that is anathema to amici's commitment to equality and fair treatment to all."

At least 60 companies had committed to signing the brief as of Tuesday evening, according to Joshua Rosenkranz, who is counsel of record on the brief and head of the Supreme Court and appellate litigation practice at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe. That number is expected to rise by Thursday, however, according to Rosenkranz. Others who have already committed to sign include AIG, Becton Dickinson, Cisco, Cummins, Kimpton, Levi Strauss, McGraw Hill, NCR, Nike, Office Depot, Oracle, Panasonic, Qualcomm, and Xerox.

Read more: Dozens of big U.S. companies to back gay marriage (Fortune/CNN)

Republican leaders sign pro-gay marriage brief

In what has been deemed an unexpected move, at least 80 top Republicans have signed a legal brief to be submitted to the Supreme Court this week, arguing that gay marriage is a constitutional right in the case over Proposition 8, a California law banning same-sex marriage.

The New York Times, which first reported on the brief, says the list includes top advisers to former President George W. Bush, four former governors and two members of Congress. “Among them are Meg Whitman, who supported Proposition 8 when she ran for California governor; Representatives Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida and Richard Hanna of New York; Stephen J. Hadley, a Bush national security adviser; Carlos Gutierrez, a commerce secretary to Mr. Bush; James B. Comey, a top Bush Justice Department official; David A. Stockman, President Ronald Reagan’s first budget director; and Deborah Pryce, a former member of the House Republican leadership from Ohio who is retired from Congress.”

The Times also noted that high-profile Republicans who support same-sex marriage – including Laura Bush, the former first lady; Dick Cheney, the former vice president; and Colin L. Powell, a former secretary of state – were not on the list as of Monday.

Last week, the Barack Obama administration filed a legal brief to ask the US Supreme Court to strike down a 1996 law defining marriage exclusively as a union between a man and a woman, marking the first time a president has endorsed same-sex marriage rights before the Supreme Court. According to the filing, the Defence of Marriage Act “violates the fundamental constitutional guarantee of equal protection” before the law stipulated by the US Constitution. 

United States

讀者回應

1. 2013-02-27 23:48  
How nice. Corporations feel their liberties are being impinged. It rather makes me sad and even disillusioned that anyone thinks this is beneficial brief. Corporations already impinge on too many areas of daily life. Let then support gay marriage in the marketplace. They have no place in legal proceedings around the rights of the individual. None.
2. 2013-02-28 16:08  
what a hoot and what a farse.. now all the big corporations are
all for gay marriage?? right, what corporate american will not do
to keep the gay dollars coming in. there is a Repbulican list of
supporters for same sex marriage?? this is the same political
party who want's to have a constitunional amendment defining
marriage as between opposite sexes. hopefully, the Supreme
Court will remember to leave the religion,big corporations and
Politics at the door and to quote Spike Lee "do the right thing"
3. 2013-03-01 13:13  
Personally I don't care at the moment what the reason is for it. Of course they are looking after their own self interests but if it leads to the ban being overturned I don't really care. If you don't like the corporation you still don't have to buy its products.
4. 2013-03-01 16:31  
Bare in mind, not that long ago the Supreme Court blessed corporations with "we the people" status. So not to be happy with their involvement in the laws of the land now is just a tad late. I only wish that when they given these NEW rights, some obligations would have gone along with it. Had I done to the Gulf of Mexico what PB did with their oil, I would be in jail long term. But for some reason that "class of people" the corporations are, prevents us from JAILING their leaders. Europe has figured out with their banking crimes; jail the bank's leadership, that will end it. Oh by the way, it works.
回應#5於於2013-03-17 06:33被作者刪除。
6. 2013-08-05 12:51  

請先登入再使用此功能。

請選擇新聞及專欄版本

精選個人檔案

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

讚好

合作夥伴

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement