Test 2

Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

登入

记住我

初到 Fridae?

Fridae Mobile

Advertisement
Highlights

More About Us

新闻&特写

« 较新的 | 较旧的 »
20 Aug 2010

Same-sex marriage in Australian election spotlight

The issue of marriage equality has intensified in the lead up to Saturday's election with Prime Minister Julia Gillard and her opponent Tony Abbott repeatedly challenged on the issue.

In June, Prime Minister Julia Gillard declared that she does not personally support legalising gay marriage in Australia and that her party's policy on same-sex marriage will remain the same under her prime ministership.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard (left) faces opposition leader Tony Abbott in the polls on Saturday.

Last Friday she told The Australian newspaper she rejected same-sex weddings because "the marriage act has a special status in our culture", adding that she appreciated "our heritage as a Christian country".

"My position is – and it's the Labor Party's position – that for this nation, with our heritage as a Christian country, with what's defined us and continues to define us, the Marriage Act has a special status in our culture and for our community. My position appreciates that," she said.

Australians go to the polls on Saturday in what is predicted to be one of the closest battles in decades. Some analysts have raised the possibility of a hung Parliament – an event not seen in Australia since 1940. The latest Newspoll showed a 50-50 percent split between Gillard’s Labor Party and opposition leader Tony Abbott’s Liberal-National coalition.

Gillard, an unmarried atheist who lives with her male partner, became Australia’s first female prime minister by seizing control of her party from her former boss Kevin Rudd on June 24 and called elections weeks later.

She faces Abbott, a former trainee priest who is said to be a staunch Catholic family man, also opposes same-sex marriage and that marriage should only be between a man and a woman.

Australian Marriage Equality National Secretary, Peter Furness, said Spain, Portugal, Argentina, Mexico and all other countries that allow same-sex marriages have a much longer "Christian heritage" than Australia.

"We demand Julia Gillard explain what Australia's "Christian heritage" has to do with same-sex marriage – does she believe discrimination is acceptable because some people think homosexuality is a sin, or because a minority of couples still marry in churches even though marriage is a civil, secular institution in Australian society?" Furness said in a press statement.

He added: "We demand to know how far Gillard will go in the name of our "Christian heritage" - will she outlaw divorce and interracial marriages, recriminalise homosexuality and abortion, suppress atheism, and remove herself and all other women from leadership roles?"

"Anyway you look at it, Gillard's statement is offensive, ridiculous and extreme and must be explained or withdrawn."

Meanwhile former Labor leader Mark Latham last week said he regretted supporting the Howard Government’s ban on gay marriage in 2004 for fear of being denounced by parish priests.

Speaking on the Austereo network on Monday, Latham said it was the power of churches that compelled him to not support marriage equality.

“I regret the fact that in 2004 I didn’t tell the churches to go get nicked and Labor had a policy of allowing gay marriages. Most people who are reasonable about it recognise that love is the important thing,” Latham said.

“Unfortunately parties are scared of the churches. If you’re running for office, you don’t want some parish priest denouncing you from the pulpit on Sunday before the election ... It’s that power of the churches that holds it back.”

Australia currently has civil unions in the Australian Capital Territory, Tasmania and Victoria.




Australia

读者回应

1. 2010-08-20 20:54  
The article states "..Unfortunately parties are scared of the churches..". Yes indeed the parties have been scared of the churches for far too long. Which is rather strange when so many Australians might identify as being affiliate with a particular church but not in an active way. Everyone knows that a significant percentage of Australians don't go to church except for weddings and funerals.

Add that to the fact that that there is a definite attitudinal shift in Asutralian. It has been reported that surveys indicate that around 60% of the population either support or do not oppose the legal recognition of gay marriages.

It just goes to show how well the churches are able to get their opinions supported by the "traditional" politicians however the tide is slowly turning in politics.

A number of people in the major parties are lobbying their own parties to change their policy towards gay marriage. Some that come to mind in the Labour Party there is Cath Bowtell openly disagreeing with her party and behind closed doors Penny Wong is also lobbying for change but as a cabinet member has to publicly toe the party line.

In Melbourne, the Greens candidate Adam Bandt is poised to be the first Green to win a seat in the House of Representatives and taking the seat from Labour.

The winds of change are picking up. We just have to keep working toward the point where everyones human rights are recognised in this country.

Personally I'd believe it would be far more palatable to the politicians if we could come up with an alternative term to the words 'marry' and 'marriage'. I don't like them because of the religious connotations but everyone knows that it's far easier to ask some one to marry them than to 'civil union' them and to tell their friends that "we are married" rather than "we are civil unioned".

Is there some term that means the same that we can "own"? I'd love to be able to be "somethinged" in preference to being "married"
2. 2010-08-21 01:07  
an unmarried atheist who lives with her male partner.......... so like sex buddy?

compared to other progressive societies......... australia: backward
3. 2010-08-21 01:10  
Andy370, I like your comments and thoughts. How bout: "I would like to commit my life and future to you". When you decide to share your life with another, it's a pledge of commitment, honour and respect to someone you love. So it could be a PPC ..... a personal pledge of commitment.
4. 2010-08-21 01:59  
Maybe is her hair colour or something?? she reminds me of Miranda from Sex and the City..
5. 2010-08-21 02:49  
Separation of Church and State!!! It is unbelievable that leaders can govern with their own belief and enforcing that belief onto people who don't share the same. These two candidates shouldn't be allow to run because ultimately they are going to push their personal belief and ideology.
6. 2010-08-21 06:31  
In my point of view, legalising same sex marriage has a significant impact on our society in overall. There is probably more recognition and acceptance nowadays for same sex couples, but there is still the needs to let everyone knows that it is ok to be in love with someone of the same sex and persue sexual behaviours with mutual agreement.

What upsets me recently is this case of father performing sexual activities with his 9y/o son here in Australia. First, i assume this guy has sexual attraction towards males, and second, i believe he did it to his own son because he has no where to turn to. But what shocked me the most was, his wife assisted in the whole process, and even joined him in some cases. What will happen to this little fella when he grows up? I believe there are many similar cases in the past, and still happening nowadays. What a shame!

I think by letting everyone knows that same sex attraction is ok, and we can be open about it is significant. That brings my point to why i suggest we should legalise same sex marriage. Regardless if anyone of you wants to go down the path of marriage (same with some heterosexual couples did - de facto they call), it is all about educating ppl out there, who still hide in their closet and undertake this "cowardly" approach to deal with their sexuality by picking those that are helpless and innocent.

I want to get this through the whole society out there, not just us who use this website. Let's help educating ppl about us, and about who we are. :)
7. 2010-08-21 08:04  
Hmm a choice between judgmental whack job 1 and judgmental whack job 2.
8. 2010-08-21 08:05  
Hmm a choice between judgmental whack job 1 and judgmental whack job 2.
9. 2010-08-21 09:15  
Is she trying to change history or trying to mislead people ? if she wants to talk about heritage then it should be about the aboriginal people in Australia ...not some heritage that invaded Australia a few hundred years ago ....that I called an arrogant and brutal annihilation of Australia's indigenious identity by the invasive species....plus I am not sure how her own lifestyle measure up in the eyes of the so-called holy heritage ....

while the rest of the world is continuously defending the separation of religion from state ..it seems that Australia is heading the other direction ...perhaps if they really want to do that bring back all the Christian heritages in the Dark Ages ...I think they forbid woman from being a priest so how can a woman be Prime Minister ...I think she should gracefully step down too to preserve the holy heritage, no ?

... but to have someone who doesnt really live up to the teaching of Christianity to harp on Christian heritage is probably the biggest joke around ...but if you say that this is what her party wants ? then why on earth do her White Al Qaeda party members elected her in the first place ? shouldnt they find someone so-called holier like Tony Abbott ?

" do not judge or you too will be judge , with the measure you used, it will be measured to you, Julia "



10. 2010-08-21 09:51  
Being an Australian, I really have to laugh at some of the comments from the NON-Australian wanna-be experts on Australian politics. Absurd.

As important as it may be, 'same-sex marriage' is not an important, election winning issue for government party's anywhere, and there are more important issues facing the world today.

As 'andy370' post #1 points out over 60% of australians do not oppose same-sex marriage. Same -sex marriage will eventually come, but today I'd rather know that the world wont burn up, or I will be thrown on the streets in poverty because of a mismanaged economy, and that compassion would be shown to refugees, the mentally ill, sick, and the rights already won are safegaurded,etc, etc etc.

Some of us need to be more than one-track minded and grow up a bit.


修改於2010-08-23 10:29:24
11. 2010-08-21 10:23  
Absolutely agree here with Jupiter of post #10. Its laughable to even make any comments on the issue if you are not resident of Australia. More funny if it comes from such a police state like Singapore.
Australia is not ready for same sex marriages as yet, though if any major party would combine it with any reasonable policies on economy, immigration and other issue it will be adopted. Unfortunately we have no choice, we have to choose between bad and worst ..... there are much more important issues as far as running the country is concern - economy, immigration etc. Its not about two queens tying the knot in the registry office. Even Bob Brown who is openly gay knows that.
12. 2010-08-21 12:14  
It's deplorable and says much about the power of the Churches and the Christian Lobby that a socially progressive, atheist, female PM still feels the need to appeal to Australia's Christian "heritage" in order to defend her opposition to gay marriage. The fact is that 60% of Australians supported the idea of legalizing gay marriage - and that was back in 2007. It's probably higher now. It's even worse considering that Penny Wong, a minister in Gillard's cabinet, is a totally "out" lesbian (and an Asian too!), and even she has to oppose gay marriage. What an absolutely bloody mess. Why? Because to win government, the parties have to appeal to voters in marginal seats and unfortunately many in those marginal seats are evangelical Christians. That and the dominance of the NSW Labor Right faction guarantees that we won't see gay marriage in Australia for a long time. It has nothing to do with democracy and everything to do with party politics & hanging on to power.
If we want gay marriage, we need to give more Senate seats to the Greens, led by another out homosexual, Bob Brown. Only then will we see real change.
13. 2010-08-21 12:33  
i don't think anyone is suggesting that the gay marriage question should take precedence over other, more pressing, issues. however, it has been a point of contention in the election debates and it's not unreasonable that it should be picked up and discussed (passionately) in a website devoted to gay issues.

and i welcome comments on the issue from non-Australians. Because god knows we're certainly not averse to offering our own opinions about politics in other countries.

as for the issue itself - personally, i am an Australian and i love this country. But sometimes i wish we were a little less effing provincial.
14. 2010-08-21 12:58  
fosterfan#13 ... I agree with you that gay marriage should be "picked up" and debated in forums such as this.. but with respect, I dont agree with " I dont think anyone is suggesting that the gay marriage question should take precedence". I think some people do indeed think it should take precedence. Only today i was talking to somebody and they indicated they would not vote for Julia Gillard because she doesnt believe in gay marriage.

Of course, indeed informed comments about politics in Australia from non-australians is welcomed, but as a person who also loves my country I do take exception to comments such as:
our Australian politicians are "whackjobs" and....
" compared to other progressive societies australia: backward"

Give me a break. I dont welcome those type of comments. Who would ? Do you ?
They actually sound racist.
修改於2010-08-21 15:48:02
15. 2010-08-21 15:50  
Last Friday she told The Australian newspaper she rejected same-sex weddings because "the marriage act has a special status in our culture", adding that she appreciated "our heritage as a Christian country".

Gillard, an unmarried atheist, lives with her male partner.

Enough said.
16. 2010-08-21 16:22  
@#14 - well i think i might have said worse things about politicians of other countries (George Bush. regularly, when president) so - personally - am happy to afford the same liberty to non-Australians regarding our politicians. calling Australia 'backward' as a general statement might get a little personal, but i'd rather know what people REALLY think about us.
17. 2010-08-21 16:52  
@#16'fosterfan - well, yes, I admit I have to agree with you on those points.
修改於2010-08-21 17:00:29
18. 2010-08-21 17:09  
I think sometimes these politicians rally the power of religion simply as an added ammunition for their cause, especially during an election race.

19. 2010-08-21 20:59  
Well the election is over and the dust is beginning to settle. It's going to be a hung parliament. There are a few high-points to mention. The Labour Party lost Melbourne to The Greens candidate Adam Bandt. In the Senate, The Greens are increasing their vote as well. Plus a 20 year old candidate has rolled the sitting member. It's good that the voice of youth is finally going to be heard but as a Liberal Party member he has to contend with the views of the mad-monk Abbot and his cronies.

I agree with #12 DiskoDan's comments about marginal seats. It is a reality that we have to acknowledge and work to convince them that we're not going to eat their babies or burn down their church. It's a pity they seem to think that we should all live our lives the way they do. How can we make them understand that?

Thanks Thayt #2 for your suggestion of a PPC but it doesn't really roll off the tongue and sounds more like a substance you might take to make your night out rather more enjoyable.

To Kaido #5. Whilst I agree with the first part of your post, I think it is amusing that an American should so indignantly tell Australia we shouldn't allow candidates to vote with a religious agenda. Can I respectfully suggest that the US of A has far more extreme religious fanatics in government than we do. Plus we don't print "In God We Trust" on our money either.

I take great comfort in seeing a predominantly Catholic country such as Spain has changed their laws to grant all of their citizens the dignity to marry. There seems to be an increasing acceptance of the idea of gay marriage in Australia even though most politicians have not yet grown the balls to admit it. I am confident that the winds of change are growing stronger and as long as we keep pushing, Australia will soon come into line with the progressive countries who have already allowed gay marriage.
20. 2010-08-22 01:19  
I notice certain politician like to talk abt gay-marriage to divert our attention on economic well being, tax structure, better job, better living, social welfare system.

My sister who live her not-married white husband and has a kid in Australia. I asked her y not married, she replied, if divorce, hand clean but both wrote WILL. Make sense, rather then spend $$$ and time for divorce lawyer.

Don't get me wrong, I m not oppose yr marriage. lol
21. 2010-08-22 06:41  
Christ. Where did they find that interviewer?!?!? She never SHUT UP. She talked for like 80% of the interview!
22. 2010-08-22 08:36  
Bravo Fosterfan ...it takes maturity and professionalism to be able to debate or discuss objectively on issues ...people with sensitive ego and pride and cannot take criticism or see differences in opinion should stay away from forum such as this for the sake of their health ...

thanks for highlighting to people that we are not trying to ignore world hunger etc but exactly what this forum is all about...but if people think that gay issues should be left till we solve world hunger, poverty , world peace ...then perhaps we should only discuss this in 3010....dont you think so ?

If people think that only Australian can comment on issues in Australia ? thats worst than absurb ...it is really 'backward' opsss ..."I did it again"...come on which century are we in ? Or maybe we should reserve the right to native Australians only ...which disqualify all of us ...or mayb Fridae should set the site so that only Australian can comment on articles about Australia ? ....

修改於2010-08-22 08:41:42
23. 2010-08-22 09:44  
well ryuuji I don't agree that nobody outside Australia can comment on Australian issues but I think people from other countries should perhaps examine what is going on in their own countries prior to making rather strong statements about what should or should not happen inside of Australia.

I quite like a good debate that addresses the issues and gives constructive criticism and suggests new ideas or courses of action. However it gets a bit much when people are blind as to what's happening in their country when they slag off at what the see wrong in Australia.

What I am suggesting is that posters should make there comments intelligent and add to the discussion and refrain from making comments such as posts #7 & #8 by maxmillian who seems to think that saying the same thing twice adds credibility.

24. 2010-08-22 12:18  
absolute crap all this inane waffling on, gays accessing medieval notions of heterosexual marriage had absolutely no impact on these elections
25. 2010-08-22 12:35  
Both of them (Gillard and Abbott) have been trying to capture the power of nothing. At least in relation gay marriage that is maintain the status quo, make yourself a small target and don't up set the red necks. Australia now has a hung Parliament (and not in a good way) mainly because the two major parties made such an effort to look the same and labor particularly refused to stand up for anything. I am not personally someone who wants to marry my partner but believe it should be there for those who want the luxury of divorce. Strangely enough this election may see gay marriage on the agenda as the only political party that has marshalled any enthusiasm is the one the that believes in gay marriage, the Greens. This is no coincidence. This article isn't that off the mark.
26. 2010-08-22 14:30  
the sexual tension between these candidates is really hot, they should just get a room
27. 2010-08-22 16:52  
Iagunabro, thank you for a particularly novel thought that is both unlikely but also compelling. Fortunately Julia is post menapausal.
28. 2010-08-22 19:59  
I find your sentence about "fortunately Julia is post menopausal" kind of insulting to women.

Are you suggesting that once a woman hits a menopausal age, where her fertility declines/ceases, she becomes a sexless person and unattractive?

29. 2010-08-22 20:42  
It means that they can't have children and the Joke was about a child between Julia and Tony Abbott
30. 2010-08-23 04:09  
@lagunabro, you are alwasy saying trash, you should go try that with your adopted kids,why did you not give birth to your children yourself.

We are talking seriosu issues here, you always come and annoy this chat room.
31. 2010-08-23 05:55  
Boy, don't I just love the chauvinistic attitudes pervading these forums each and everytime someone dares to criticise anything closely or remotely related to Australia.

As a non-Australian not residing in Australia, I feel adequately informed to say that this Gillard woman is a joke. Living in concubinage herself, yet this atheist finds pride in her country of adoption's Christian heritage and the sanctity of marriage. Now, that is precious.

There's more yet to come though. Our wee Welsh lady is bound to provide us with much to marvel at, immigration-wise. We shall then see how far hypocrisy can stretch, shan't we?
修改於2010-08-23 07:38:09
32. 2010-08-23 07:25  
No need to take offense when I offer up an opinion on these two candidates. Indeed many of you have offered up plates of criticism about our American politicians past and present. I welcome it. It gives me insight into what the world thinks, and offers up good debate. I would hope you would feel the same.
33. 2010-08-23 08:02  
I thought the whole idea of having the comment option was so that all members could express personal views and allow each other to engage in healthy debates and share ideas and opinions.
34. 2010-08-23 09:56  
For Aussies, pls encourage repressed people from the likes of S'poreans exercise their muscles of expressions here, to build courage to do the same and make changes too in their own world some day, so that they can thank you one day for your paving the growth.

For the political situation in Aust, gay community has to decide to either play the situation to their advantage when there IS an opportunity or fall for other political pawn play some other day I suppose.

And while we're at it, why not move foward with the current and seize the day, come up with a new gay marriage term to add to the Oxford dictionary when 'Vuvuzelas' can get in and make history already. I'm sure any political party would love to lay claim to be the 'father' of one, starting Down Under?
35. 2010-08-23 10:54  
unfathomable post#31 ... you see, thats why I laugh at comments on forums here.
You complain about "chauvinistic comments pervading these forums"... yet you yourself just did a big chauvanisitc job on "this Gillard Woman"

Yes indeed "we see how far hypocrisy can stretch"
修改於2010-08-23 10:58:43
36. 2010-08-23 11:41  
hopefully green will make the right decision and not compromise on their promisses...its exciting!!!
37. 2010-08-23 14:33  
house i will like you opinion, I have a friend who like to have sex with animals, he does not think of humans at all, what do he do in his case, do he push for the law to permit him and protect him in public?
38. 2010-08-23 17:41  
jupiter101 - post #31 and several others - Then surely, that makes two of us.
For your information, and my pleasure:
Chauvinism. n. (definition as intended in my previous post and in context with the don't-you-dare-besmirch-our-glorious-nation-if-you're-not-local comments preceding it) :- Militant devotion to and glorification of one's country; fanatical patriotism

So you see, accusing me of being chauvinist just because I voiced out my opinion of the Gillard woman, oops I meant Ms Gillard, was way off the mark. Never did I put forward my own country and claim it was better than yours; not that I'm not proud of it but rather that I deemed doing so would be unnecessary and silly.

Since you didn't make it clear which part of my criticism of Gillard was a "big chauvinistic job" and offended you (each part differs in nature and essentially can't constitute a big whole, as you would suggest), I would assume this is ample reply to your post.

On another note, I now bury the hatchet. Does nothing for me to have never-ending online vitriol exchange. You are entitled to your freedom of speech, as am I. You are welcome to find fault in UK politics, teenage pregnancy or whatever; you don't need my permission nor my approval.
In return, I don't feel like sugarcoating my words whenever I mention Australia, and I won't.


修改於2010-08-23 18:33:42
39. 2010-08-23 18:15  
Go the Greens! :)
40. 2010-08-23 18:59  
unfathomable -post #38- My apologies. I had a misunderstanding of the definition of "chauvinism"

After being enlightened to the true meaning of this word, it makes my post seem illogical.

I'm sorry for that.
41. 2010-08-23 19:20  
jupiter101 dear, no harsh feelings here either. I'm sorry that my initial comment offended you, though mistakenly and unintentionally.

Did I say my sister lives in Melbourne, VIC? That I feel strongly about Oz should come as no surprise to you now.
Oh well, if I may say: Advance Australia fair! ;o)

请先登入再使用此功能。

请选择新闻及专栏版本

精选个人档案

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

赞好

合作伙伴

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement