Test 2

Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

登入

记住我

初到 Fridae?

Fridae Mobile

Advertisement
Highlights

More About Us

时尚娱乐

« 较新的 | 较旧的 »
25 Aug 2010

Sandcastle

How was Boo Junfeng’s first feature film?

Movie also known as: 沙城

Rating: NC16 (Mature Theme and Sexual Scene)

Director: Boo Junfeng

Screenplay: Boo Junfeng

Cast: Joshua Tan, Elena Chia, Bobbi Chen, Ng Jing Jing, Samuel Chong, Andrew Seow, Nora Samosir

Release: 26 August 2010 (SG)

GV Cinema Europa Exclusive

In English, Mandarin and Hokkien

Geoffrey Reggio and Philip Glass blew the minds of an entire generation with their fast forward vision and critique of urban life in Koyaanisqatsi. Almost 20 years later, Boo Junfeng creates a thematic mirror with Singapore in Sandcastle. Singapore, as the artist sees it, is where everything moves as slow as possible, accompanied by a choir performing downtempo versions of Dick Lee’s patriotic songs while channelling John Cage’s minimalist composition “As SLow aS Possible”.

When a film begins like that, you know that it will feel dispirited and lethargic, with characters swimming and talking through an invisible fog. That fog happens to be the sins of history committed during Lim Yew Hock’s indiscriminate crackdown of leftists and Communists (real, alleged, and crypto). And even if Singapore has moved on, the coming of age story of En (Johsua Tan) and the parallel backstory of his father’s (Andrew Seow) student protest days suggests that Singapore’s future generations are in fact stuck like flies in amber until they confront the historical trauma squarely – beyond the officially sanctioned narratives that suggest we remember who won and for our own good, politely forget the rest, and move on.

Weaving in and out of this main storyline are several very Singaporean sub-plots and themes, which vary in clarity, development, and focus: a senile grandparent who may need to be put in a home; an army colonel who is so well-meaning, you can’t really fault him for being a stand-in for the oppressive, illiberal, disciplining institution; a first love story with a PRC girl; the co existence of Christianity and Buddhism in Chinese families; and so on...

The film could do better developing (or alternatively, pruning) its generous spread of sub plots, which suffer by competing for runtime with the film’s equally generous and repetitive artsy shots of stray cats, the beach, the endless vista of Singapore’s apartment blocks. Unlike the short film medium which Boo is competent at, such shots don’t work the same way in a feature film. Here, it just gives the impression that there’s a good 45-minute short film wearing a lot of padding to pass for a feature film.

读者回应

1. 2010-08-26 19:55  
hi you are so good nas
2. 2010-09-08 12:13  
I wonder if anyone will call Ozu's "pillow" shots (i.e. repetitive artsy shots of buildings, landscapes, etc) "padding". And isn't the reviewer contradicting himself when he asserts that the subplots are competing for runtime (I agree that these are not as fully developed as they could be), yet in the same paragraph dismisses the feature as an overextended short? It is true that Boo Junfeng is not Hou Hsiao Hsien, and Sandcastle is no City of Sadness (that comparison to Koyaanisqatsi is plainly off-the-mark). But it strikes me as remiss for a reviewer in Singapore, especially one in the alternative press, to not acknowledge, surly grudging appraisal notwithstanding, the film's significant contribution to national discourse.

请先登入再使用此功能。

Social


请选择新闻及专栏版本

精选个人档案

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

赞好

合作伙伴

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement