Test 2

Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

登入

记住我

初到 Fridae?

Fridae Mobile

Advertisement
Highlights

More About Us

时尚娱乐

« 较新的 | 较旧的 »
27 Oct 2010

The Last Exorcism

The Last Exorcism has a first class script but occasionally falters on its execution.

Rating: NC16 (Some Disturbing Scenes)

Director: Daniel Stamm

Screenplay: Huck Botko, Andrew Gurland

Cast: Patrick Fabian, Iris Bahr, Louis Herthum, Ashley Bell

Release: 28 October 2010 (SG)

There is a sequence right in middle of The Last Exorcism that showcases the brilliant premise of the film. Reverend Cotton Marcus (Patrick Fabian) prepares the bedroom of a girl (Ashley Bell) allegedly possessed by a demon before the exorcism ritual. The documentary crew engaged by him captures his preparations for the exorcism in detail – wires are strung to the girl’s bed, hidden miniature speakers are prepped with the appropriately ghoulish sound effects and so on. You see, the Reverend is a man of god who, in his long years as a hothoused religious prodigy and a professional exorcist, realises that there are no such things as demons – only people who believe in demons and think they need a proper ritual to cleanse themselves of whatever metaphorical inner demon that is really ailing them.

He’s not a conman but what he does is, despite his honest intentions and holy purposes – a con. This backstage moment fulfils two functions in this horror fake documentary. It’s a witty and sarcastic aside to the audience – these people think they’re bloody smart, do they? Wait till they find out there’s really a demon! The whole idea of a found footage film is to have the smug filmmakers succumb to what they do not believe in (The Blair Witch Project, Cannibal Holocaust) on camera at the end. Yet at the same time, this double aside (the shared moment between the reverend and the audience, and between the script and the audience) itself signals a metatextual wit pioneered in F For Fake by Orson Welles and then resurrected by Wes Craven in his horror films.

Yet maddeningly, the film cuts between the bedroom where the reverend is doing his preparation work and the outdoors a few hours prior to the preparation in the bedroom, where the reverend does the show and tell for his documentary crew. You see, if this is a found footage film, a fake documentary where the entire film crew dies at the end, where did they have the time to edit the footage they just shot barely a few hours ago?

This sequence therefore is also emblematic of how the film hints at its potential greatness and then squanders it away almost immediately. Other errors abound: despite this being a fake documentary, horror film sound effects (clashing chords, actual non-diegetic music) happen with the ‘real horror’ begins, establishing shots are used to set up scenes when the cameraman of the documentary couldn’t possibly have been there, footage obviously shot with two cameras when there’s only one cameraman in the story, and so on. All this tend to puncture the aura of believability and dramatic tension that the script attempts to build up. And for the fake documentary genre, it is all about believability.

读者回应

抢先发表第一个回应吧!

请先登入再使用此功能。

Social


请选择新闻及专栏版本

精选个人档案

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

赞好

合作伙伴

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement