Test 2

Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

登入

記住我

初到 Fridae?

Fridae Mobile

Advertisement

More About Us

Advertisement

新聞&特寫

« 較新的 | 較舊的 »
8 Apr 2019

Singapore's main opposition party will not call for anti-gay sex law repeal

Head of the Worker's Party warns against 'politicising' the issue.

Singapore’s main opposition party has said it will not call for the repeal of the law, which criminalises sex between men, because there was no consensus within the party. Pritam Singh, head of the Worker’s Party (WP), said it was detrimental to ‘politicise’ the issue. Instead, he urged people to put ‘family first’, engage in dialogue and respect individual consciences. LGBT rights advocates have called Singh’s comments ‘disappointing’, and showing a ‘lack of empathy’ for those affected by the law. Section 377A of Singapore’s Penal Code is a legacy from the British colonial-era and prohibits sex between men. The Singaporean government has said that the law will not be actively enforced. But LGBT rights proponents say its retention reinforces homophobia in the city-state. A renewed call for repeal was mounted last year. But studies show that the majority of Singaporeans think Section 377A should remain.
To read more, click here! 

Singapore’s main opposition party has said it will not call for the repeal of the law, which criminalises sex between men, because there was no consensus within the party. Pritam Singh, head of the Worker’s Party (WP), said it was detrimental to ‘politicise’ the issue. Instead, he urged people to put ‘family first’, engage in dialogue and respect individual consciences. LGBT rights advocates have called Singh’s comments ‘disappointing’, and showing a ‘lack of empathy’ for those affected by the law. Section 377A of Singapore’s Penal Code is a legacy from the British colonial-era and prohibits sex between men.

The Singaporean government has said that the law will not be actively enforced. But LGBT rights proponents say its retention reinforces homophobia in the city-state. A renewed call for repeal was mounted last year. But studies show that the majority of Singaporeans think Section 377A should remain.

To read more, click here!

Singapore

讀者回應

1. 2019-04-08 20:50  
it is clear, section 377 is not from british
2. 2019-04-10 00:53  
I was previously a volunteer with them, but both the renewal of leadership and direction of the party are heading towards to are extremely disappointing. It is now, and definitely will also be, a significant factor for me when it comes to voting for upcoming GE as an Aljunied GRC voter.

Everyone please remember, there are different options when it comes to voting. Vote for ruling party, vote for alternative party, and EQUALLY IMPORTANT, VOTE FOR NONE.
3. 2019-04-10 00:57  
Just to make some references and for those who doesn't know about this issue:

https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/wps-faisal-supports-wear-white
4. 2019-04-10 01:17  
Opposition parties in Singapore are weaklings. This is just an example of why that is so.

請先登入再使用此功能。

請選擇新聞及專欄版本

精選個人檔案

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

讚好

合作夥伴

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement