Test 2

Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

Login

Remember Me

New to Fridae?

Fridae Mobile

Advertisement
Highlights

More About Us

21 Feb 2007

news around the world 21-feb-07

The second International Conference of Asian Queer Studies will convene in Sydney this week. New Jersey has became the third state in the US to offer civil unions, meanwhile in Italy, the civil union debate rages. A Russian lawmaker has introduced a bill to recriminalise homosexuality, punishable with a five-year prison sentence.

International Queer Asian Studies Conference to be held in Sydney Feb 21-23

Conference co-organiser Peter Jackson of Australian National University
The second International Conference of Asian Queer Studies will convene in Sydney from Feb 21-23 as part of the Sydney Mardi Gras Festival.

First held in 2005 in Bangkok by the AsiaPacifiQueer Network (APQ) founded by academic Peter Jackson of Australian National University in Canberra, the conference will feature keynote addresses from major figures in Asian queer scholarship and a series of themed panel streams on intra-Asia/Pacific queer cultural flows.

Jackson said he founded the APQ to combat the difficulties of conducting queer Asian research in Australia and getting funding.

"Queer studies have been minoritised in the university system," he says. "People submitting applications for queer projects are advised to make the title sound straight or you'll be very unlikely to get funding."

He hopes that in having an international conference, it lends more creditability to the field of queer related research in Asia.

Keynote speakers include Rosanna Flamer-Caldera of Sri Lanka, Co-Secretary General of the International Lesbian and Gay Association [ILGA]; Prof. Neil Garcia of University of the Philippines, Diliman; Dr Chandra Shekhar Balanchandran of Dharani Trust, Bangalore, India and Dr Dd Oetomo of Surabaya University & GAYa Nusantara, Indonesia.

Queer Asian Sites is held in collaboration with the Trans/forming Cultures (TfC) Key University Research Centre in Communication and Culture from Feb 21-23 and the Queer Space: Centres and Peripheries Conference convened by the UTS Centre for Social Theory and Design in the Faculty of Design Architecture and Building on Feb 20 & 21. For more info, visit apq.anu.edu.au/qas.


Civil Union Law Takes Effect in New Jersey
New Jersey has became the third state in the US to offer civil unions and granting registered same-sex couples new legal rights.

Under the new laws, New Jersey couples who had previously been joined in civil unions or married in other states or nations were automatically granted the legal benefits but not the title of marriage.

Couples who want to be in a partnership could apply for licenses but must wait 72 hours before they can hold civil union ceremonies, the same waiting period for weddings.

Vermont and Connecticut are the other two states that allow gay couples to be joined in civil unions while California offers broadly similar rights under the title of domestic partnerships. Massachusetts is the only state that recognises gay marriage with the same legal rights as heterosexual unions. The US federal government and 45 states however do not recognise the unions.

New Jersey lawmakers created civil unions in December, less than two months after a state Supreme Court decision held that gay couples had a right to the same benefits as married couples.


Italy: government officials and Vatican leaders meet as civil union debate rages
Leaders of Italy's government including Prime Minister Romano Prodi and senior Vatican officials opposed to the bill held closed-door talks on Monday as a proposed law to recognise unwed and gay couples has drawn sharp criticism from the Catholic Church

The proposed legislation recognises relations between gays, unmarried heterosexual couples and others who choose to live together, granting rights in areas like inheritance and health care and greater access to joint health schemes, pensions, state housing and jobs.

The Vatican and some Catholic fear this would lead to what they call "pseudo-marriages" for gays in civil ceremonies, undermining the traditional Christian family based on marriage between men and women.

The bill probably will be voted on in the Senate.


Moscow lawmaker sponsors bill to recriminalise gays
A Russian lawmaker has introduced a bill to recriminalise homosexuality, punishable with a five-year prison sentence for anyone found convicted of gay sex. Gay sex was illegal and punishable by five years of hard labour until 1993 when Communism fell.

The bill, introduced into Russia's lower house by Deputy Nikolay Kuryanovich, would prohibit gays to congregate - essentially ban gay Pride parades or meetings.

The bill follows a civil rights lawsuit filed by pride organisers at the European Court of Human Rights against the city of Moscow and mayor Yury Luzhkov over the city's ban of a pride march in 2006.

On May 27, marchers attempted to hold a parade despite the ban which resulted in the Police having to arrest both marchers and protestors. Earlier in May police had to form a human chain to hold back some 150 skinheads and Russian Orthodox Church supporters protesting a gay event at a Moscow club.

No political party has supported the bill publicly although Kuryanovich, who is not affiliated with any party, is believed to have widespread support from former Communists and parties allied to the Russian Orthodox Church.

Russian gay activists have meanwhile pledged to hold a march in May in defiance of a ban.

Reader's Comments

1. 2007-02-22 11:04  
For the IQAS Conference, it is a pity that there is only one paper on Singapore's situation, and it is presented/analysed by an academic from U. of California.

Are there no local academics who have done research on the local situation and written papers/articles to accredited journals to present an insider's view?

Or is there simply no interest on this topic within local academia?
2. 2007-02-22 11:24  
And, so the gay marriage debate rages on. I am no less baffled than I was when the issue first came to prominence some years ago.

Try as I may, I am still unable to empathise with the unfathomable need in some gay people to have the state (which is primarily run by STRAIGHT people) put a stamp of approval on their lives. My personal view is that it's akin to saying, "I'm not worth anything UNLESS STRAIGHT people tell me that I am". If that view holds true, then we are a very sorry lot because such warped self-esteem serves merely to continually stoke the flames of discrimination by the powers that be. If we feel like trash, others will treat us like trash.

Comment #3 was deleted by its author
4. 2007-02-22 23:29  
My opinion is that why we fight for gay marriages is to enjoy equal rights given to hetero marriages. Why should there be a difference, since all of us contribute in one way or another. In singapore context, married hetero couples can buy a public housing unit at age 21 and get some money back if they are staying near their parents. How nice.
5. 2007-02-23 07:50  
heemale, i disagree with your comment. Gay marriage is not only about recognition but also fair treatment in terms of financial, social, parental [...] rights. Why should gay people be treated in a different way, if we are all equal!? But maybe you do not think we are equal? On my side of the world (in France), this gay marriage+adoption is a hot topic these days as it is one of the main topics in presidential debates with a constant opposition of the pros (left wing) and the cons (right wing)... (although now most accept the "civil union" concept, with more or less rights attached to it)
6. 2007-02-24 01:00  
While I understand the thoughts expressed by heemale, I also understand the desires of gay or lesbian couples in a committed relationship who want hospital visitation rights, health and tax benefits given to straight couples. I think much of the problem comes from the term "marriage" which to many religious zealots has a religious connotation. I suggest that if these people see "marriage" as a religious rite then the civil government should get out of the marriage "license" business altogether. Why not just have governments issue a civil union contract which provides the legal basis for the union much as they now issue a marriage license. Government should have no business deciding who should be joined but what they need to do to qualify for and participating in the contract and what benefits are allowed with that. The non religious straight couples, gays, and lesbians could have their civil unions contracts. The term gay marriage seems to have most people up in arms against this. I think more people would be more attuned to allowing civil union contracts between gay/lesbian couples as can be seen in New Jersey and other states, governments allowing such things. I think by definition too many people define marriage as between man and woman. Get the government out of the marriage business and into the civil union business for couples, straight and gay. Let the churches have their "marriages".
7. 2007-02-24 07:41  
full support to mr "hunk" trouble's suggestion!... equal terms for equal rights.

Please log in to use this feature.

Social


Select News Edition

Featured Profiles

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

Like Us on Facebook

Partners

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement